Iran bombing- Trump's political tool?
The relations between USA and Iran have been deteriorating for many decades now. It got worse when Donald Trump renounced the long term deal of nuclear weapons in May 2018, after being elected as president of the United States. He labeled this deal as 'worst deal ever negotiated.' The deal had taken place in the term of President Barack Obama and Hassan Raouhani, the moderate president of Iran back in 2015. Iran agreed on the deal in terms of recouping an economic-up graph.
Donal Trump and Barak Obama
PC:wikimedia.org
Besides abandoning the deal, USA tightened sanctions targeting Iran's oil export business that led to the economic recession in Iran. And, the correspondence between the two countries went to pot and became foes.
General Qasem Soleimani
PC:Google
On 3rd of January, 2020 USA struck over Iraq by drone and killed Iran's most influential and dominant leader Qasem Soleimani near the Baghdad airport in the capital of Iraq. Suleimani was the proxy-power of Iran and was the general of Qud's force. He was the master-mind behind all activities across the country or even in the middle east and was factual foreign minister when it comes to the matter of war or peace. He had become a very popular subject of documentaries, news reports, and even music albums.
Trump declared Qud's force an international terrorist group. According to Trump, Soleimani was agitating Tehran to fightback against US-imposed Sanctions and caused a war with Iraq. Additionally, Trump claimed, He was responsible for some absolute atrocities in the middle-east.
On January 8th, Iranian forces retaliated by launching a dozen ballistic missiles against two military bases and claimed 80 US troops were killed. Although there is very little basis to the claim, as America has denied any casualties. Irani supreme leader had called this attack, 'A slap in the face' and added, 'They don't want war but they would confront and retaliate if something happens in the Islamic region.' 'We don't want Americans on our land and execute the killing of its sons.'
Trump did revert back by saying "All is well" and "all of our soldiers are safe." He added addressing the Iranian regime," your campaign of terror, murder, and mayhem would not be tolerated anymore, it can't go further."
Trump is urging all other countries that we should all work together towards making any deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and peaceful place. Trump is addressing those countries of the region, commonwealth and strong allies of Iran, and urging to be part of de-escalations. Countries like France, England are exhorting not to have retaliations anymore, Stating it is dangerous for people living there.
Trump's political tool?
According to factorial news, speculation can differ about the reasons behind the attack from both sides. Firstly, Trump has to be more firm about what he says and does. There is real concern about
Trump's recklessness and unpredictability. Moreover, Trump has to choose his words wisely and be sure of what he meant.
Set upon Soleimani in Iraq, in the reaction of killing a US contractor doesn't justify itself. Attacking someone by risking the lives of thousands of innocent people can't be imminent self-defense. Killing Soleimani could be politically ad-hoc in order to firm his position in upcoming elections. Being tough is cool in United State's culture but Trump's decision about killing Soliemani is just so naive.
Drone strike to kill any officials or authority of some country is a grave exemplar.
In the end, America should stop being an intruder with its own interests Iran as well as Iraq. The country should let the land and people of the land breathe freely. Trump can't use this attack as his Trump-card when it comes to the election.
Live, Let Live
PC:wikimedia.org
Besides abandoning the deal, USA tightened sanctions targeting Iran's oil export business that led to the economic recession in Iran. And, the correspondence between the two countries went to pot and became foes.
General Qasem Soleimani
PC:Google
On 3rd of January, 2020 USA struck over Iraq by drone and killed Iran's most influential and dominant leader Qasem Soleimani near the Baghdad airport in the capital of Iraq. Suleimani was the proxy-power of Iran and was the general of Qud's force. He was the master-mind behind all activities across the country or even in the middle east and was factual foreign minister when it comes to the matter of war or peace. He had become a very popular subject of documentaries, news reports, and even music albums.
Trump declared Qud's force an international terrorist group. According to Trump, Soleimani was agitating Tehran to fightback against US-imposed Sanctions and caused a war with Iraq. Additionally, Trump claimed, He was responsible for some absolute atrocities in the middle-east.
On January 8th, Iranian forces retaliated by launching a dozen ballistic missiles against two military bases and claimed 80 US troops were killed. Although there is very little basis to the claim, as America has denied any casualties. Irani supreme leader had called this attack, 'A slap in the face' and added, 'They don't want war but they would confront and retaliate if something happens in the Islamic region.' 'We don't want Americans on our land and execute the killing of its sons.'
Trump did revert back by saying "All is well" and "all of our soldiers are safe." He added addressing the Iranian regime," your campaign of terror, murder, and mayhem would not be tolerated anymore, it can't go further."
Trump is urging all other countries that we should all work together towards making any deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and peaceful place. Trump is addressing those countries of the region, commonwealth and strong allies of Iran, and urging to be part of de-escalations. Countries like France, England are exhorting not to have retaliations anymore, Stating it is dangerous for people living there.
Trump's political tool?
According to factorial news, speculation can differ about the reasons behind the attack from both sides. Firstly, Trump has to be more firm about what he says and does. There is real concern about
Trump's recklessness and unpredictability. Moreover, Trump has to choose his words wisely and be sure of what he meant.
Set upon Soleimani in Iraq, in the reaction of killing a US contractor doesn't justify itself. Attacking someone by risking the lives of thousands of innocent people can't be imminent self-defense. Killing Soleimani could be politically ad-hoc in order to firm his position in upcoming elections. Being tough is cool in United State's culture but Trump's decision about killing Soliemani is just so naive.
Drone strike to kill any officials or authority of some country is a grave exemplar.
In the end, America should stop being an intruder with its own interests Iran as well as Iraq. The country should let the land and people of the land breathe freely. Trump can't use this attack as his Trump-card when it comes to the election.
Live, Let Live
Comments